Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:55:26 07/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 2001 at 04:26:36, Harald Faber wrote:
>On July 24, 2001 at 03:03:06, Tony Hedlund wrote:
>
>>On July 24, 2001 at 01:14:39, Harald Faber wrote:
>>
>>>On July 23, 2001 at 17:25:55, G. R. Morton wrote:
>>>
>>>>I seem to have mixed impressions from some of the Info I've read. Opinions?
>>>>Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>SSDF *pretends* that GambitTiger 2 is stronger, but see that they test
>>>ChessTiger 14 in the Chessbase-version which has NO ADJUSTED opening book in
>>>opposite to the Chesspartner-version. And the difference between them in SSDF is
>>>marginal, so, in spite of less games I think that my tourney says more the
>>>"truth" than SSDF because in my comparison both Tigers play the same opponents
>>>(did they in SSDF? I don't think so) and both are the Chesspasrtner-versions
>>>WITH ADJUSTED opening books.
>>>
>>>For more information see http://www.geocities.com/Harald1312/HaraldFaberE.html
>>
>>It was a request from Christophe that we tested ChessTiger 14 in the
>>Chessbase-version and GambitTiger 2 in the Chesspartner-version. WE try to
>>follow advice from the programmers.
>
>
>Christophe certainly wants to know of the performance of the Chessbase-versions.
>It is certainly different than the Chesspartner-version.
There is no difference in the engine of Rebel-Tiger II by Schröder BV, of Chess
Tiger 14 for ChessAssistant 6.0 and Chess Tiger 14 by ChessBase.
They have been provided with the SAME engine DLLs.
The *only* difference is that they have different opening book.
Christophe
>>My next match will be GambitTiger 2 CP - ChessTiger 14 CB, both on A1200.
>>
>>Tony
>
>
>Sounds interesting. On the one hand Tiger 14 is the stronger program (:-)), on
>the other hand Tiger 14 has to suffer from the Chessbase-book...we'll see what
>counts more. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.