Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 10:40:30 07/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 2001 at 10:54:40, Adam Oellermann wrote: > >>Computer programs have now passed every test it seems that people have produced >>objections for to debunk the above results. > >I'm probably being pedantic, but I might point out that the majority of chess >engines which are available are certainly not capable of performing at GM level. >My own engine, Blikskottel, can manage no better than class A performance - by >whatever standards you care to judge - and many of the other engines are in the >same position. > >Now perhaps a few programs are contenders for consideration as GM-performers, Namely Chess Tiger 14 ,Gambit Tiger, Deep Fritz , Rebel , Shredder , Yace , Crafty , SOS 2000 ,etcetera .... not so few are gm or near gm class. Regards. on >the right hardware and against the right opponents; I reserve my judgment for >the meanwhile. However, credit belongs to the massive amounts of effort which >have been put in by the leading chess developers and researchers - as those of >us who can only dream of beating a GM will testify :-) > >Regards >Adam
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.