Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 14:29:48 05/06/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 1998 at 15:06:24, Thorsten Czub wrote: >I can only say: we are working on this. >The WINDOWS version could be a good way to realize your idea. >We always joke when we watch CSTAL play: >if you want to win against Genius e.g. let CSTal play against it. >If it has an advantage than switch CSTAL vs. Genius and let Genius win >the winning position against itself. >Or I do always call : if we have a winning position, switch off TAL >chris. >But he does not like "preprocessing"... > >BTW: he told me something I should tell here, since "I am banned by the >bean counters" as he said ! :-)) > >He says he believes nobody answers here when it comes to a content or a >game-score because no one here has the vocabulary to say something about >chess. He said he believes that the people here do so heavily discuss >about RESULTS and SCORES and FACTS and EVIDENCE because they don't know >about chess. So the only thing they are capable of talking is Well, I hope I am not conmsidered inside the group of bean counters as much as I have been praising CSTAl from the beginning like that guy in the desert before Christ arrived. Nevertheless, I think Enrique have a great point: a CSTAL with a more conservative mood AFTER the wild one that gives the advantage could give a tremendous boost. I know Chris worked many years in t his and the reslt is very good, BUT it seems that is not enough and something more effort is required. I wonder if the old Machak approach- two engines, one counting the beans, the other makins strategic judgements- could do the job. My greetings to chris. And for you, of course. Fernando >quantified: it is results, what he counts bean-counting.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.