Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: More Junior 7 results

Author: Chuck

Date: 17:59:02 07/24/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 24, 2001 at 14:25:53, James T. Walker wrote:

>On July 24, 2001 at 09:23:32, Matt Brown wrote:
>
>>On July 24, 2001 at 08:56:17, James T. Walker wrote:
>>
>>>I have played 30 games of Junior 7 vs Hiarcs 7.32 (2 Athlon 900 TB) with Junior
>>>7 winning by 19.5-10.5.
>>>I then played Junior 7 vs Crafty 18.10 with Junior 7 winning by 20-10.  Since
>>>Hiarcs and Crafty scored similiar I am now playing a match between the two.  So
>>>far Hiarcs 7.32 is leading by 5-4.  Crafty is definitely getting better.  All
>>>games were G/60 minutes.
>>>Jim
>>
>> Which program is stronger, Deep junior 7 or Junior 7? Is there a difference?
>>
>>thanks
>
>Hello Matt,
>I don't know if there is a difference since I don't have Deep Junior 7.  I only
>know that as of right now Junior 7 is the top of my database for G/60.  It is
>not a good blitz program compared to Chess Tiger 14.0 though (G/5).

On the surface, it should be natural to assume that Junior 7 would be stronger
on a single cpu machine and Deep Junior would be stronger if your computer has
more than one cpu. However, there may not be a difference on a single cpu. Maybe
someone who has both versions (!?) could provide evidence. Practically, if you
have one cpu the difference is likely to be negligible, if you have a multi-cpu
machine you would obviously want Deep Junior.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.