Author: Jouni Uski
Date: 02:27:51 07/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 25, 2001 at 05:20:16, Sune Larsson wrote: >There have been some negative voices heard about this program. Statements >like "just pushing wood around with no plan" etc. Also the results haven't >been too good. A lot of effort has been put down to test different settings >in CM8, with some fruitful results. My question is if anybody has done the >same with Nimzo 8? A while ago I read some suggestions of changing the >"Middlegame mobility" from default 24 to 48 - and the "Endgame mobility" >from 10 to 20. But I'm not sure about the results. Then there are other >parameters in Nimzo like "Weight king safety", "Weight pawn structure", >"Futility cutoff", the different "Piece values" and also the styles of >"Solid", "Aggressive", "Offensive" and "Allround". >If not an absolute top program, at least it should be possible to make >the playing style interesting and attractive. > >Any comments are welcome. > >Sune Can somebody also try to get more from DeepFritz and Chess Tiger by changing parameters :-) My own feeling: waste of time. The programmer must him/herself found the best settings! Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.