Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 08:15:04 07/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 2001 at 10:47:21, Joshua Lee wrote: >Sometimes it is like pulling teeth to get an answer around here but maybe i >should rephrase my original question: > >Can i get some estimates please I am not trying to say one program is better >than another because it searches 2million nodes a second or 5 ply at tournament >time controls, I Would like to know which programs are the quote en quote "Slow >Searchers" I wouldn't include Gandalf or Deep Fritz as they easily get over >200Kn on most hardware as does Crafty. > > >Thankyou Ok, Joshua. My apologies to you since i didn't read correctly your question. BTW Where is the point in getting a "slow searcher" when everybody knows that the true power of a chess program is in superior tactics, not certainly in a better positional understanding. If I remember well, several tries to optimize the positional knowledge disadvantaging the search deepness gave unsatisfactory outcomes. Regards.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.