Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Can your program avoid BxN?

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 19:35:10 07/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 26, 2001 at 18:46:35, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On July 26, 2001 at 17:58:59, James T. Walker wrote:
>
>>On July 26, 2001 at 13:55:55, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On July 26, 2001 at 11:17:02, James T. Walker wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hello Uri,
>>>>Well you did not have the game history and I used 128M hash but it's not
>>>>comforting to note that Hiarcs 7.32 took almost 10 minutes to find Be3 on your
>>>>computer.  In a tournament time control of 40/2 it may or may not take that
>>>>time.  Maybe it depends on how much time it has left before the 40 move mark.
>>>>This still leaves a big hole in faster time controls.  I personally don't like
>>>>the idea of tuning a program to play best at long time controls and ignoring
>>>>blitz.  I still believe most people do not take the time to play their computers
>>>>at 40/2.  The last time I asked how many people do this only one person
>>>>responded.  Even FIDE has dropped that time control and I believe it's time for
>>>>SSDF to do the same.
>>>
>>>Blitz is what most people play.
>>>Eventually, chess will be gone, and everyone will play lightning.
>>>Won't that be a joyful day.
>>
>>Hello Dann,
>>People will still enjoy a nice "relaxing" game of chess but not with their
>>computers because they are killers of average players.  I think most people play
>>the computer at blitz time controls but take as much time as they like to make
>>their own moves.  At least that's how I usually play mine.  I still feel rushed
>>because the computer moves so quickly and I find myself trying to do the same. I
>>have to remind myself to take my time and look for better moves.  I still get
>>killed by the computer.  Still, the trend is to shorten the games and I'm happy
>>that the games do not go to the "seconds" anymore.  I firmly believe that chess
>>games should be played at one sitting and 10 hour games are just not interesting
>>to watch.
>
>I like the postal pace best.
>I hate crappy chess, full of blunders and stupid moves.
>I really like those breathtaking moves where you look at it and say:
>"What the heck is *that*?!"
>And then you have to puzzle over it for at least 15 minutes before you can see
>what was going on.

****
I have that problem even when the computer is playing blitz! Anything over 4
plies is a complete mystery to me.  :-)
****

>So I guess it's just "different strokes for different folks."

****
I agree.
****

>I can't stand what FIDE did to ruin the game of chess [for me].  But that's just
>me.  It probably made 99% of the players and audience much happier.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.