Author: Chessfun
Date: 15:46:14 07/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2001 at 17:49:38, Chessfun wrote: >On July 27, 2001 at 17:45:58, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On July 27, 2001 at 15:19:17, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On July 27, 2001 at 14:46:36, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>> >>>>On July 27, 2001 at 09:33:32, Chessfun wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>My fun rating list has been updated to include the new programs; >>>>> >>>>>Crafty 18.10 >>>>>Goliath Light 1.5 >>>>>Junior 7 >>>>>Shredder 5.32 >>>>> >>>>>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999 >>>>> >>>>>Sarah. >>>> >>>>Hello Sarah! >>>> >>>>I see that Shredder 5.32 is stronger than Deep Shredder. >>>>Crafty 18.10 is stonger than Nimzo 8. >>>> >>>>Interesting news, >>>>thanks. >>>> >>>>however I belive that Nimzo 8 is stronger than Crafty 18.10. :) >>>> >>>>Kind regards, >>>>Eduard >>> >>> >>>Shredder 5.32 only currently has 63 games, but chances are somethings >>>were changed after the release of Shredder 5 and Deep Shredder. >>> >>>Nimzo's have never faired well in any tournament I've ever run, nor >>>in any matches it's played. >>> >>>As my friend who got me started autoplaying, (Chris Taylor) would say, >>>I just let em go at it, who wins, wins...how bout that Chris?. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>Hi! >> >>Yes, you are right about Nimzo except that I believe it is a tad stronger on >>tournament time control. I thinh it is only Thorsten that knows it is a top >>program and he has already played six games. > >Hi Bertil, > I agree, Nimzo seems to get stronger with longer controls. >That goes for both 7.32 and 8. > >>Everything indicates that Shredder5, Deep-Shredder and Shredder5.32 are almost >>identical in playing strength. > >Yes, hard to say exactly whether Stefan did actually make any changes >to it. At this point I don't have enough games to be totally confident >that it will hold. > >>I am a bit disappointed with Goliath1.5 because I have played a few houndred >>games with it and I believed it was a bit stronger (infact it was ver. 1.2). >>But now I have seen your results and C. Lieberts results so I guess you are >>right. > >I was as well after it's blitz performance in Franks tournament's. > >>Have you compared your list with Gerhard Sonnabend's excellent list, the results >>are surprisingly similar I think, so I believe you can stop calling the list the >>"fun list" and rename it to the propher name Chessfuns list. > >No I haven't seen the list. Can you post the URL?. Got it; http://home.t-online.de/home/GS.Stuttgart/index.html Thanks. >Sarah. > > > >>Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.