Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:42:24 07/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2001 at 09:10:15, Sune Larsson wrote: >On July 28, 2001 at 08:28:40, Martin Müller wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>Full of enthusiasm I bought the promising program DJ7 hoping to have bought an >>outstanding, high-end product. Much to my regret I find that it does not behave >>as it should. It sacrifies unsound, it shows evaluations far from being >>realistic and has a very poor performance as far as I see from my end. >> >>It is sad, that even after such a "sprechstunde" users like me are left without >>any advice or hope that a patch or an update will be planned to help. >> >>I greatly appreciate the work and succes of Amir Ban and Shay Bushinsky but am >>at a loss to understand the present situation. >> >>Give me some hope, please. >> >>Kind regards >>Martin > > > I think this is the present character of Junior 7. The authors are working > in a very interesting direction, but the program is far from complete. > Whenever that is supposed to happen. IMO it's an experimental version and > just possibly, but not verfied, more suited to play humans than computers. > By the way, those unsound sacrifices you mention - have you noticed this > in comp-comp games or in your own games vs Junior? > > Sune I do not know but it seems that the problem is with Deep Junior7 and not with Junior7. I do not believe that Junior7 was not tested in comp-comp. I can see in chessfun's rating list that Junior7 is better than Junior6. My Junior7 could not reproduce the strange evaluations of Deep Junior7 so I suspect that Deep Junior7 has some bugs and was not tested. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.