Author: Chuck
Date: 08:02:26 07/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2001 at 06:51:54, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On July 28, 2001 at 23:42:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: > > >>My conclusion... ponder=off was worse for crafty as its time management was >>not well designed nor tested for this mode. > >A simple (about 2 lines) fix would be to reduce 'usage' a >bit if pondering is off. > >Easy to implement, fixes the most obvious problems, and it's >logical to have this. > >On Linux you can run with two engines with pondering on, but >I don't trust Windows much for that. Even more because some >engines (like Gerbil) lower their priorities. Running on of >them in this kind of match would be very unfair. > >-- >GCP In agreement with this last statement, I have observed under Windows where 1 engine badly effected its opponents nps when pondering was on. There's no sense in trying to match 2 engines under this condition. Chuck
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.