Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 08:49:47 07/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2001 at 12:35:38, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>On July 29, 2001 at 06:14:35, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>
>>Chess Curiosities by Tim Krabbé you can find on his Homepage. After yesterday
>>you can find new curios Anti-computerchess games!
>>
>>Thanks Tim! I agree all your comments, and your game against Century with ( you
>>say :) "Nemeth-Gambit" is very interesting!
>>
>>http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess/chess.html
>>
>>and click to "Open Chess diary".
>>
>>I find Tim’s homepage wonderful:
>>
>>http://www.timkrabbe.nl
>>
>>
>>I play a another curios game against Deep Shredder!
>>
>>Position after move two from white:
>>
>>
>>[D]rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/4P3/5Q2/PPPP1PPP/RNB1KBNR b KQkq -
>>
>>The game:
>>
>>
>>[Event "Blitz30',P600,128MB"]
>>[Site "Stuttgart"]
>>[Date "2001.??.??"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "Nemeth,Eduard"]
>>[Black "Deep Shredder"]
>>[ECO "C20"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>
>>1. e4 {0s} e5 {Buch 0s} 2. Qf3 {3s (Sf3)} Nf6 {+0.43/12
>>26s} 3. Bc4 {1:13m (Sc3)} Nc6 {+0.48/12 42s} 4. c3 {1s
>>(Sc3)} Be7 {+0.77/12 43s} 5. b4 {5s (Dg3)} O-O {+0.69/12
>>50s} 6. d3 {5s} d6 {+0.54/11 32s} 7. h3 {4s (Dg3)} Be6
>>{+0.65/11 30s} 8. Bxe6 {3s} fxe6 {+0.49/10 1s} 9. Qe2 {3s
>>(Dg3)} a5 {+0.35/12 44s} 10. b5 {2s} Na7 {+0.19/13 48s}
>>11. a4 {3s} c6 {+0.08/12 40s} 12. bxc6 {2s} bxc6 {+0.07/12
>>31s} 13. Nf3 {1s} Nc8 {+0.02/12 32s} 14. O-O {21s} c5
>>{-0.06/11 8s} 15. Na3 {26s (d4)} Nb6 {-0.12/10 9s} 16. Nb5
>>{3s (Ld2)} Nfd7 {-0.32/11 1:35m} 17. c4 {3s (Td1)} Nb8
>>{+0.16/10 11s} 18. Be3 {6s (h4)} Nc6 {+0.08/11 14s}
>>19. Rfd1 {5s (Sd2)} Nb4 {+0.16/11 23s} 20. Bd2 {13s (Sd2)}
>>Qd7 {+0.19/11 46s} 21. Ra3 {10s} Rab8 {+0.19/11 19s}
>>22. Rb1 {7s} Qe8 {+0.19/11 26s} 23. Nc3 {4s (Tab3)} Qg6
>>{+0.23/11 41s} 24. Nb5 {3s} Ra8 {+0.23/10 24s} 25. Be3 {3s}
>>Rad8 {+0.19/11 27s} 26. Nc3 {3s (Tab3)} Nd7 {+0.20/11 19s}
>>27. Nb5 {3s} Rf7 {+0.19/11 21s} 28. Nc3 {2s (Sh2)} Nxd3
>>{+0.31/11 24s} 29. Qxd3 {5s} Rxf3 {+0.58/11 1s} 30. Kh2
>>{26s (Tb5)} Rff8 {+0.67/10 13s} 31. Rab3 {18s} Qe8
>>{+0.56/10 1s} 32. Rb5 {8s} Ra8 {+0.32/11 7s} 33. Rb7 {12s}
>>Ra6 {+0.35/11 16s} 34. Qd1 {32s} Qd8 {+0.23/11 0s} 35. Qg4
>>{30s (Db3)} Rf6 {-0.25/11 13s} 36. Nd5 {6s} Rg6 {-0.84/11
>>14s} 37. Nxe7+ {1s} Qxe7 {-5.61/12 1:53m} 38. Rxd7 {6s} Qe8
>>{-6.37/12 2:06m} 39. Qh4 {5s} Ra8 {-6.81/11 10s} 40. Rxd6
>>{3s} Rf6 {-6.95/11 23s} 1-0
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>Eduard
>
>I haven't played through these games, but I checked out your others. Do you do
In this games yes, then I would not a bishop with Bxf7 played when i not know
what will the program played. Against humans I analyis many variations before
I play against him, you not? But I played in last years many games against
programs (i think 3000) an I played many games in "Wertungsmodus" against Fritz
too!
>as Tim Krabbe suggests and do some fiddling so that you know in advance what the
In this games (homepage T. Krabbe) yes, correctly. But I can this moves played
in "Wertungsmodus" too, and I will win, or not?
But, in my last game was I here post,I do not know that I win the game (against
Deep Shredder). I thinks first it will be a draw, but then played DS a bad
move.
>program is going to play, and try several things until you find a stupid spot?
>
I sayed: I played in my life many, many games against computers, and I played
many "another moves" too.
>I'm not asking this with hostile intent. I think that's a fine way to do it,
>but I would like to know.
It's ok. I have not a problem! My problem is "english" (!) then I can not ever
all this say what I think, this is for me a big problem. My friend
translated me your text and this is now my "bad" english-answer, sorry.
Kind Regards,
Eduard
>
>Thank you,
>
>bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.