Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:38:39 07/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 30, 2001 at 18:33:50, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On July 30, 2001 at 18:05:56, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I believe that it is also possible to beat grandmasterrs by lines like 1.d4 h5 >>2.e4 e5 with black if you try enough games. >>Does it mean that they do not "play chess". >> >>Uri I doubt you would beat any GM by playing h5 after d4, unless he fell over dead, laughing so hard... This is exploiting a known hole in an engine's understanding, and then doing it over and over. Forget that nonsense with a GM. > >If you had infinite access to the GM, and the GM either didn't learn, or you >could manually reset him between games, and he was guaranteed to play the same >thing in response to any particular move, you could do this, but maybe not with >1. d4 h5. The point of 1. d4 h5 is that it removes the program's ability to >vary while attempting to set up a long-term trap. A "read-only" human would see >this. But if you beat him on a tactic or a simple oversight, you could repeat >it forever, and it's just a matter of playing enough games that he makes *one* >mistake that you can cash in on. > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.