Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 11:18:58 07/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2001 at 13:46:22, odell hall wrote: >I do not think that Deepblue's results are indicative of how smart it >was, but that it had a a huge billion Dollar company that could afford the >machinery to make deepblue shine, I think Chrisopher with Chess Tiger, was as >succesfull on the puny pen 3 866 as deepblue, that is something much more >impressive, It's not so much that the designers of Deepblue are so Brilliant, >but had the money to back them up, I wonder how Ed shroeder or Christopher >would do if they had the kind of financial backing that the programmers of >Deep Blue had ? I guarentee kasparov would not even have Won a Game!!!!!!! You seem to be conveniently forgetting a few things: a) When the Deep Blue project was started, the people working on it were (among) the best in their field at that time. That was around 1995. The rise of ChessTiger has been very recent, around 1995 I do not think many people on this forum had even heard of it. And it was a lot weaker then. Christophe's experience was much more limited. b) Deep Blue is hardware. I would honestly be surprised if Christophe would have the required knowledge to design and implement the chess chips. The Deep Blue team had that knowledge. It is so easy to make redicolous statements without any form of data backing them up. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.