Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 22:44:33 07/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2001 at 01:40:03, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 31, 2001 at 18:49:37, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On July 31, 2001 at 18:36:53, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>><snip> >>>Franz Morsch saying the main difference between this version of Fritz compared >>>to its predecessors did not lie so much in greater chess knowledge but more due >>>to the machines newfound ability to deal with anti-computer chess strategy, and >>>to learn from its mistakes. He also said that he believed that this incarnation >>>of Fritz is every bit as strong as the Deep Blue II that defeated Kasparov and >>>has far greater "chess knowledge". >>><snip> >> >>For a machine with many thousands of tunable chess parameters, carefully >>adjusted by teams of programmers and GM's > > >carefully adjusted by programmers and GM's? >I doubt it. The programmers first used a gradient method, which was based upon thousands of GM games. Then, individual parameters were hand-tuned by the GM's advice. >I think that you need a lot of time to adjust the parameters correctly and they >had not the time to do it. They certainly could have done a lot more if they had more time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.