Author: Tony Werten
Date: 04:43:45 08/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2001 at 12:59:16, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On July 31, 2001 at 10:36:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>The only constant at these events is "there is no constant." They required an >>author a year ago. I couldn't go and didn't try to find someone to go for me >>since the rules were very clear. They were changed at the last minute. > >They didn't change them. People ignored them or simply lied. Don't bother Bruce. I wouldn't be suprised if people who actually joined our discussion last month would now start to claim they didn't now. I have no problem believing it is possible to miss some discussions, or not bothering to read the website of an important event even when is says to reread it from time to time because thinks can change. It can happen to someone or even sometwo or three. But the amount of people now claiming to know of nothing is at least unrealistic to me. Tony > >>Now we have SMP vs no SMP. Had I taken the time to finish arranging for a good >>alpha (single-cpu) machine (I had talked to Compaq about this) it would have not >>been worthwhile since now SMP machines are allowed. >> >>Someone isn't thinking when the rules change that late into things. Rules >>should be fixed for a _YEAR_. As they have in the past at ACM events... > >This is correct. > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.