Author: Mike Castañuela
Date: 10:07:19 08/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2001 at 09:42:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 01, 2001 at 05:03:06, Graham Laight wrote: > >>On July 31, 2001 at 22:37:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On July 31, 2001 at 18:36:53, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>> >>>><snip> >>>>Franz Morsch saying the main difference between this version of Fritz compared >>>>to its predecessors did not lie so much in greater chess knowledge but more due >>>>to the machines newfound ability to deal with anti-computer chess strategy, and >>>>to learn from its mistakes. He also said that he believed that this incarnation >>>>of Fritz is every bit as strong as the Deep Blue II that defeated Kasparov and >>>>has far greater "chess knowledge". >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>Good to say that...:) >>>> >>>>Regards. >>> >>> >>>If that is a direct quote from Frans, my respect for him just took a _huge_ >>>nose-dive. The quote is simply nonsense. >> >>Presumably, the lost respect will be restored if Fritz wins. :) >> >>-g > > >Nope. Fritz could win 6-0 and that statement would _still_ be ridiculous to >make by someone that knows something about computer chess. Why? Prof. Hyatt, you mean that if X Program (PC), not matter with what score its defeats to the current human World champion, then DBII has been the Best program forever? The results do not count, beyond subjectivas discussions?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.