Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Strength Implications of an Opening Book

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 05:15:37 08/02/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 02, 2001 at 07:03:06, Adam Oellermann wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>I have reached that point in the lifecycle of Blikskottel where I am thinking
>about building an opening book. I am writing Blikskottel in order to win a bet,
>and one of the terms is that *no* code is to be taken from other chess engines.
>Therefore I need to write all the opening book stuff from scratch.
>
>My question is this: what kind of strength benefit can I expect from
>automatically building an opening book out of a database of GM-level games?
>Blikskottel currently rates around 1850-1900 on FICS, but is often forced to
>play very awkward positions resulting from inferior opening play.
>
>Many thanks
>Adam
>
>PS: I know that a better plan would be to build a "hand-tuned" opening book, but
>there are a few problems:
>- under the terms of the bet I would have to do it *myself*
>- I am a rather weak player (maybe 1500)
>- I don't really have the time or inclination anyway

Something which can help is if you want a small openings book use Kasparov's
games most of the time computers do agree with these moves.
But i also have a database with 35.000 games which is prety good for an
openingsbook
containes games from 2600 rated and above and analyses



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.