Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WORLD MICROCOMPUTER CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP 2001 (REVISED RULES)

Author: Frank Schneider

Date: 09:08:34 08/02/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 01, 2001 at 16:36:41, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On August 01, 2001 at 12:12:57, Tony Werten wrote:
>
>How i read the suggestion from Levy is:
>  - you enter the building and can say
>      "i want to play for the wmcc title"
>         which means you might be multiprocessor
>         or not, but you play for possibly 2 world titles
>           a) WMCC title if you win the tournament in front of
>              everyone who mentionned 'wmcc' when entering
>           b) if you entered as amateur and you did end up highest
>              you get the amateur title if you have most points
>     "i want to play for the single cpu title"
>       which means you play everyone and if you have most points
>       in the category single cpu, then you win that title,
>       you can't win the other 2 titles of course.
>

If there are two tournaments (single and multi) there should be two
titles (professional and amateur) in each tournament (congratulations
to Diep[*] in this case?).

Given only 3 titles 2 of them should be in the tournament with more
participants - very likely the single-tournament. It does not make sense
to have an amateur-title in the multi-tournament if there is maybe only
one amateur playing on a multi. Amateurs would have the choice to
a) play in the multi-tournament for the amateur title with no chance to
   compete with professionals on their multis
b) play in the single-tournament with no chance to get the one title
   offered there.


Frank

*of course only if Ferret gets the professional title :-)


>>On August 01, 2001 at 11:43:58, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>
>>>This just came in from David with the request to post.
>>>
>>>I think it is okay and will reconsider my withdrawl.
>>>
>>>Thanks David.
>>>
>>>Ed
>>>
>>>==========================
>>>
>>>        WORLD MICROCOMPUTER CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP 2001
>>>
>>>            A MESSAGE TO ALL PROSPECTIVE PARTICIPANTS
>>>
>>>
>>>A number of chess programmers have expressed serious concern that the rules of
>>>this year's World Microcomputer Chess Championship have been changed at short
>>>notice to accommodate multi-processor machines. In my view the objections being
>>>raised are reasonable, but on the other hand having made the original
>>>announcement it would be unfair at this stage for the ICCA to bar
>>>multi-processor entries from the tournament.
>>>
>>>Ideally I would have liked to consult with my colleagues in Maastricht on this
>>>issue before taking a decision as to the best course of action. Unfortunately
>>>they are all on vacation at the moment and their date of return is too late for
>>>any new decision to benefit several of the prospective participants. The
>>>following change is therefore my own decision entirely and any criticism for it
>>>should fall on my head alone. I should add that this decision is not necessarily
>>>an indication of the rules for next year's event but it does represent, in my
>>>view, the best compromise for 2001.
>>>
>>>        REVISED RULES
>>>
>>>        The leading program which executes on a single processor will be
>>>declared the World Microcomputer Chess Champion (single processor category). The
>>>leading program executing on multiple processors will be declared the World
>>>Microcomputer Chess Champion (multi-processor category).
>>
>>OK I'll ask it.
>>
>>Does this mean a Professional World Microcomputer Chess Champion (single
>>processor category) an Amateur World Microcomputer Chess Champion (single
>>processor category) a Professional World Microcomputer Chess Champion
>>(multi-processor category) and a Amateur World Microcomputer Chess Champion
>>(multi-processor category) ?
>>
>>Well, at least a big percentage of the participants will go home with a prize.
>>Do those 4 categories have a 2nd and 3rd price as well ?
>>
>>Anyway, I hope this change will make Ed and Christophe reconsider.
>>
>>Tony
>>
>>>
>>>        No program may participate in more than one category.
>>>
>>>I very much hope that this will satisfy most if not all of the dissenters and
>>>that we may see a large entry for the forthcoming World Championships.
>>>
>>>Regards to all contestants.
>>>
>>>David Levy



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.