Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:13:38 08/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 2001 at 14:22:32, Joshua Lee wrote: >It annoys me when Chessbase Claims their product is "Better" because of the win >of Fritz 3 The reason for this loss is explained in the Monty Newbord book >"Kasparov Vs Deep Blue" The transposition was in their database but the book >wasn't used correctly, Impressive is they found that o-o is bad in the search >which is pretty deep by the way , then the communication line dropped. > >So please people Fritz got lucky and didn't win due to more knowledge or skill >so you can stop using this for evidence of Fritz being better than deep blue 1)Fritz did not win because of 0-0 c4 was the tactical blunder of Deep thought. I remember that I tried a comp-comp game from the position before c4 and white won it(I think that it was a game between Genius3 and itself). Unfortunately I did not save the game. 2)Do they have also an excuse for the fact that Deep thought could do only a draw against Wchess in the same tournament? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.