Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:30:06 08/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2001 at 22:10:46, Dan Andersson wrote: >I'm ok with that logic! But wait? Doesn't that make the Deep Blue II a >statistical anomaly too?! And a much more probable one!? Have to think this >over, after I've finished counting the angels dancing on top of my CRT. :) The uncertainty with Deep Blue II games is close to infinity. We have no real idea (one way or another) to know the ELO within [for instance] 500 points. It does appear to play excellent chess, however. It is possible that there is some bug in the software that could be exploited and eventually the ELO would drop to a small value. I doubt it, but anything is possible. I think I have the dancing/fighting thing solved. Tai-Bo. Think about it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.