Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 10:17:10 08/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2001 at 12:54:06, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 03, 2001 at 11:24:56, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>The original situation was terrible. I can find fault with the original >>compromise decision, but it was made under pressure and didn't cause a lot of >>damage, so I think it's okay. >> >>Some of the other stuff would have been bad. Multiple entrants per team would >>have been bad. Imagine the kind of stuff that would been said in here if round >>one is Fritz versus Fritz, Junior versus Junior, and Shredder versus Shredder, >>and in order to win you have to play Junior twice and Shredder twice and Fritz >>twice. >> >>bruce > >Multiple entrants per team make sense only if there are 2 tournaments when >microcomputer should be allowed to play in both competition only if the team of >the micro does not have a multi version. > >In this case Fritz versus Fritz cannot happen because the 2 Fritz's are going to >play in different torunaments. > >Uri If I understand properly, there aren't two tournaments. There is one tournament with two titles, so there is one Fritz. The only question now is whether anyone will show up with a multi-processor machine, since the single-processor title is more desirable. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.