Author: Frank Schneider
Date: 10:25:10 08/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2001 at 13:17:10, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On August 03, 2001 at 12:54:06, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 03, 2001 at 11:24:56, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>The original situation was terrible. I can find fault with the original >>>compromise decision, but it was made under pressure and didn't cause a lot of >>>damage, so I think it's okay. >>> >>>Some of the other stuff would have been bad. Multiple entrants per team would >>>have been bad. Imagine the kind of stuff that would been said in here if round >>>one is Fritz versus Fritz, Junior versus Junior, and Shredder versus Shredder, >>>and in order to win you have to play Junior twice and Shredder twice and Fritz >>>twice. >>> >>>bruce >> >>Multiple entrants per team make sense only if there are 2 tournaments when >>microcomputer should be allowed to play in both competition only if the team of >>the micro does not have a multi version. >> >>In this case Fritz versus Fritz cannot happen because the 2 Fritz's are going to >>play in different torunaments. >> >>Uri > >If I understand properly, there aren't two tournaments. There is one tournament >with two titles, so there is one Fritz. What about amateur-titles? Will there also be two of them? Frank > >The only question now is whether anyone will show up with a multi-processor >machine, since the single-processor title is more desirable. > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.