Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: good compromise, one man, one word.

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 16:20:53 08/03/01

On August 03, 2001 at 17:57:39, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>the best shall win.
>
>this is the spirit that is ok IMO.
>its not perfect, but it decreases the damage.

Yes probably the best or one of the best wins, no doubt,
but more than one will be awarded the same title!

That is weird!!

Look my position is simple, my whole tournament would be great
if i just beat fritz and end up with 1 point.

Beating or drawing the coming world champ 2001 is less relevant.

So i have little alternatives but to join the multiprocessor
region. Even if i can only come up with 1 processor 1.4Ghz
i would join the multiprocessor region.

I assume gandalf goes for that region too for the same reason?

Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Thorsten Czub 01:48:01 08/04/01
- Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Vincent Diepeveen 06:51:03 08/04/01
Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Bruce Moreland 19:13:01 08/03/01
- Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Ed Schröder 02:23:08 08/04/01
  - Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Bruce Moreland 08:56:35 08/04/01
  - Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Uri Blass 04:18:52 08/04/01
  - Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Tony Werten 02:27:26 08/04/01
    - Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Vincent Diepeveen 06:54:16 08/04/01
      - Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Tony Werten 01:45:54 08/05/01
      - Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Chris Duggan 13:18:00 08/04/01
        
        Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Vincent Diepeveen 19:01:37 08/04/01
      - Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Dan Andersson 11:33:29 08/04/01
- Re: good compromise, one man, one word. Vincent Diepeveen 20:36:22 08/03/01

This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.