Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 20:36:22 08/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2001 at 22:13:01, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On August 03, 2001 at 19:20:53, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 03, 2001 at 17:57:39, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>the best shall win. >>> >>>this is the spirit that is ok IMO. >>>its not perfect, but it decreases the damage. >> >>Yes probably the best or one of the best wins, no doubt, >>but more than one will be awarded the same title! >> >>That is weird!! >> >>Look my position is simple, my whole tournament would be great >>if i just beat fritz and end up with 1 point. >> >>Beating or drawing the coming world champ 2001 is less relevant. >> >>So i have little alternatives but to join the multiprocessor >>region. Even if i can only come up with 1 processor 1.4Ghz >>i would join the multiprocessor region. >> >>I assume gandalf goes for that region too for the same reason? > >I'm reading this as if there is one large pool of players, but top finisher on a >single wins that title, and top finisher on a multi wins that title. You could >play someone on a single if you bring a multi. > >Am I mistaken? that's exactly how i read it, and considering past it would seem pretty logical to me. i remember 97 when the program paying $1000 entry fee still won the 'professional world title', as from the rest only very few paid $1000. This is how i see the single cpu title. We all go play under the christmas tree, both kids & adults. David has put a 2 prices under the tree called 'kid price'. Commercially seen however this 'kid price' might be of major value. As commercial thoughts aren't existing in the brains of the large majority of writers of this CCC group i will not say much about it, in that case the single cpu price is the kids price. >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.