Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 02:23:08 08/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2001 at 22:13:01, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On August 03, 2001 at 19:20:53, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 03, 2001 at 17:57:39, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>the best shall win. >>> >>>this is the spirit that is ok IMO. >>>its not perfect, but it decreases the damage. >> >>Yes probably the best or one of the best wins, no doubt, >>but more than one will be awarded the same title! >> >>That is weird!! >> >>Look my position is simple, my whole tournament would be great >>if i just beat fritz and end up with 1 point. >> >>Beating or drawing the coming world champ 2001 is less relevant. >> >>So i have little alternatives but to join the multiprocessor >>region. Even if i can only come up with 1 processor 1.4Ghz >>i would join the multiprocessor region. >> >>I assume gandalf goes for that region too for the same reason? > >I'm reading this as if there is one large pool of players, but top finisher on a >single wins that title, and top finisher on a multi wins that title. You could >play someone on a single if you bring a multi. > >Am I mistaken? > >bruce David's text is ambiguous. It can be read as: a) 2 separate tournaments (one multi tournament, one single tournament) b) 1 tournament (single and multi) and the highest multi gets the WC multi title and the highest single gets the single title. I have asked David to clarify. About (b): there is the possibility that when the best single ends above the best multi then the multi title is one big laugh. Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.