Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 02:23:08 08/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2001 at 22:13:01, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On August 03, 2001 at 19:20:53, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 03, 2001 at 17:57:39, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>the best shall win. >>> >>>this is the spirit that is ok IMO. >>>its not perfect, but it decreases the damage. >> >>Yes probably the best or one of the best wins, no doubt, >>but more than one will be awarded the same title! >> >>That is weird!! >> >>Look my position is simple, my whole tournament would be great >>if i just beat fritz and end up with 1 point. >> >>Beating or drawing the coming world champ 2001 is less relevant. >> >>So i have little alternatives but to join the multiprocessor >>region. Even if i can only come up with 1 processor 1.4Ghz >>i would join the multiprocessor region. >> >>I assume gandalf goes for that region too for the same reason? > >I'm reading this as if there is one large pool of players, but top finisher on a >single wins that title, and top finisher on a multi wins that title. You could >play someone on a single if you bring a multi. > >Am I mistaken? > >bruce David's text is ambiguous. It can be read as: a) 2 separate tournaments (one multi tournament, one single tournament) b) 1 tournament (single and multi) and the highest multi gets the WC multi title and the highest single gets the single title. I have asked David to clarify. About (b): there is the possibility that when the best single ends above the best multi then the multi title is one big laugh. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.