Author: Tony Werten
Date: 02:27:26 08/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2001 at 05:23:08, Ed Schröder wrote: >On August 03, 2001 at 22:13:01, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On August 03, 2001 at 19:20:53, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On August 03, 2001 at 17:57:39, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>the best shall win. >>>> >>>>this is the spirit that is ok IMO. >>>>its not perfect, but it decreases the damage. >>> >>>Yes probably the best or one of the best wins, no doubt, >>>but more than one will be awarded the same title! >>> >>>That is weird!! >>> >>>Look my position is simple, my whole tournament would be great >>>if i just beat fritz and end up with 1 point. >>> >>>Beating or drawing the coming world champ 2001 is less relevant. >>> >>>So i have little alternatives but to join the multiprocessor >>>region. Even if i can only come up with 1 processor 1.4Ghz >>>i would join the multiprocessor region. >>> >>>I assume gandalf goes for that region too for the same reason? >> >>I'm reading this as if there is one large pool of players, but top finisher on a >>single wins that title, and top finisher on a multi wins that title. You could >>play someone on a single if you bring a multi. >> >>Am I mistaken? >> >>bruce > > >David's text is ambiguous. It can be read as: > >a) 2 separate tournaments (one multi tournament, one single tournament) > >b) 1 tournament (single and multi) and the highest multi gets the WC multi >title and the highest single gets the single title. I was told it's B > >I have asked David to clarify. > >About (b): there is the possibility that when the best single ends above >the best multi then the multi title is one big laugh. Which would be quite amusing, considering their admittance was what started all the problems. cheers, Tony > >Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.