Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 09:57:41 08/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2001 at 12:52:54, Pete Galati wrote: >On August 04, 2001 at 12:01:15, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>...wouldn't it be nice? > >Not really. I mean I know you're joking, but I think it's best to leave the >Sargon name with the era it came from. > >It would be interesting to see if someone bought the name Sargon and use it on a >new program, it would be interesting to see if the Sargon name itself actually >had some sort of marketing value. It might. I was thinking of two things when I posted the silly message. First, I wonder if there was ANYTHING of value in the Spraklens' code/algorithms/design that might be revived and brought into the current era. But also, second, whether the Sargon name could be revived for a different program (I think it DOES have marketing value) and, if so, whether the reviver would have to pay royalties to the Spraklens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.