Author: Chris Duggan
Date: 13:18:00 08/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2001 at 09:54:16, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On August 04, 2001 at 05:27:26, Tony Werten wrote: > >>On August 04, 2001 at 05:23:08, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On August 03, 2001 at 22:13:01, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>> >>>>On August 03, 2001 at 19:20:53, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 03, 2001 at 17:57:39, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>the best shall win. >>>>>> >>>>>>this is the spirit that is ok IMO. >>>>>>its not perfect, but it decreases the damage. >>>>> >>>>>Yes probably the best or one of the best wins, no doubt, >>>>>but more than one will be awarded the same title! >>>>> >>>>>That is weird!! >>>>> >>>>>Look my position is simple, my whole tournament would be great >>>>>if i just beat fritz and end up with 1 point. >>>>> >>>>>Beating or drawing the coming world champ 2001 is less relevant. >>>>> >>>>>So i have little alternatives but to join the multiprocessor >>>>>region. Even if i can only come up with 1 processor 1.4Ghz >>>>>i would join the multiprocessor region. >>>>> >>>>>I assume gandalf goes for that region too for the same reason? >>>> >>>>I'm reading this as if there is one large pool of players, but top finisher on a >>>>single wins that title, and top finisher on a multi wins that title. You could >>>>play someone on a single if you bring a multi. >>>> >>>>Am I mistaken? >>>> >>>>bruce >>> >>> >>>David's text is ambiguous. It can be read as: >>> >>>a) 2 separate tournaments (one multi tournament, one single tournament) >>> >>>b) 1 tournament (single and multi) and the highest multi gets the WC multi >>>title and the highest single gets the single title. >> >>I was told it's B >> >>> >>>I have asked David to clarify. >>> >>>About (b): there is the possibility that when the best single ends above >>>the best multi then the multi title is one big laugh. >> >>Which would be quite amusing, considering their admittance was what started all >>the problems. >> >>cheers, >> >>Tony > >But considering this option the chance of this happening >would be smaller than winning the Formula 1 championship >with the slowest cars. > Didn't Shredder already do that on a single-processor?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.