Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 19:01:37 08/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2001 at 16:18:00, Chris Duggan wrote: >On August 04, 2001 at 09:54:16, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 04, 2001 at 05:27:26, Tony Werten wrote: >> >>>On August 04, 2001 at 05:23:08, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On August 03, 2001 at 22:13:01, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 03, 2001 at 19:20:53, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On August 03, 2001 at 17:57:39, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>the best shall win. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>this is the spirit that is ok IMO. >>>>>>>its not perfect, but it decreases the damage. >>>>>> >>>>>>Yes probably the best or one of the best wins, no doubt, >>>>>>but more than one will be awarded the same title! >>>>>> >>>>>>That is weird!! >>>>>> >>>>>>Look my position is simple, my whole tournament would be great >>>>>>if i just beat fritz and end up with 1 point. >>>>>> >>>>>>Beating or drawing the coming world champ 2001 is less relevant. >>>>>> >>>>>>So i have little alternatives but to join the multiprocessor >>>>>>region. Even if i can only come up with 1 processor 1.4Ghz >>>>>>i would join the multiprocessor region. >>>>>> >>>>>>I assume gandalf goes for that region too for the same reason? >>>>> >>>>>I'm reading this as if there is one large pool of players, but top finisher on a >>>>>single wins that title, and top finisher on a multi wins that title. You could >>>>>play someone on a single if you bring a multi. >>>>> >>>>>Am I mistaken? >>>>> >>>>>bruce >>>> >>>> >>>>David's text is ambiguous. It can be read as: >>>> >>>>a) 2 separate tournaments (one multi tournament, one single tournament) >>>> >>>>b) 1 tournament (single and multi) and the highest multi gets the WC multi >>>>title and the highest single gets the single title. >>> >>>I was told it's B >>> >>>> >>>>I have asked David to clarify. >>>> >>>>About (b): there is the possibility that when the best single ends above >>>>the best multi then the multi title is one big laugh. >>> >>>Which would be quite amusing, considering their admittance was what started all >>>the problems. >>> >>>cheers, >>> >>>Tony >> >>But considering this option the chance of this happening >>would be smaller than winning the Formula 1 championship >>with the slowest cars. >> > Didn't Shredder already do that on a single-processor? One that was way faster as all others were by then indeed. However this time shredder is going to be dual, still like to doubt my bet?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.