Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess tiger 12.0E V.s Chesstiger 14.0 Excuse my poor english!

Author: robert flesher

Date: 20:22:33 08/04/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 04, 2001 at 22:51:20, robert flesher wrote:

>Hello everyone me and a friend have been playing some games over the phone with
>Chess Tiger 12.0E on my machine Against Chess Tiger 14.0 on his machine. I am
>currently running a 1ghz athlon and he is using a pentiumIII 833..... i believe.
>There has been some ups and downs but its seems to me that Tiger 12.0E seems to
>be getting the edge over 14.0. This of course is not a claim but a point i am
>trying to make. There was some talk on this forum many months ago about Tiger
>12.0E playing H6 or H3 when castled and was Thought by many as  waste of time.
>Tiger 12.0E seems to play this move even in slow, non tactical positions. I
>think that due to Tiger,s exceptional tactical ability, this is a move to stop
>the opponents from starting a potential attack. I have read Christophe explain
>how Gambit Tiger assigns great bonus to pieces working in harmony against the
>opponent. I am wondering if this is the other side of that same idea. Finally i
>would like to state that i think removing this from Tiger may have been a
>mistake. This of course could be confirmed by Christophe. My finding in many,
>many computer versus computer games suggest it make Tiger stronger. I also have
>the lucky to be able to may a Master many times a week and Tiger 12.0E scores
>mucg better than 14.0. This is not a troll to say Chess tiger12.0 is stronger,
>its just a keen observation i have made, and many Very stronger players agree
>with me. :) Regards Robert



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.