Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: EGTB - dumb questions?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 21:16:54 08/05/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 05, 2001 at 10:25:46, Pham Minh Tri wrote:

>Hi all,
>Some my questions as I start my EGTBs:
>1) What have I to do when there are more pieces than I need (for probing EGTB)?
>For example, I have table of KBNK, but an endgame is KBNPK. Give the "redundant"
>pieces for opponent?


No.  You only probe after a capture move, and only when the capture takes to
you to a number of pieces you know you have tables for.  IE if you only have
3-4 piece tables, you only probe after a capture takes you to 4 or fewer
pieces.


>2) I see that index for EGTB is not simple, so why do we not apply the same
>technique as opening book: use hashkey? I guess one of the reasons is to save
>space for TBs - use halves of them. But I think we could reverse the board,
>re-calculate the new hashkey to match the TBs again? Or do I miss something?
>
>Many thanks for any help.
>Pham



You don't want to _search_ 2 gigabyte files.  EGTBs compute an index that takes
you directly to the game result for that configuration of pieces.  No searching
whatsoever.  The opening book is not _nearly_ that efficient.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.