Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 2 questions.1)Is there a subject search engine? 2)Which proccessor now?

Author: Adam Oellermann

Date: 03:44:23 08/07/01

Go up one level in this thread



>>the 1400 mhz t-bird with one of the top programs can beat some GMs
>>     most of the time. it cant beat some GMs all the time.
>>     and it cant beat all GMs some of the time.
>>      whew---did i cover them all.
>>
>>   these guys will bite my head off  if i say that this system would be GM
>>      level all the time.
>>
>>     what is your purpose for this purchase. server gaming, personal play,
>>        depends on your purpose. if you plan on playing against your
>>          program yourself, unless you are a GM, then any of the processors
>>            are ok, intel or amd.   the 800 mhz amd is cheap now.
>>     if you plan on gaming at one of the chess servers, then you will need
>>       the most mhz that your budget will allow.
>>
>>     kburcham
>
>
>My true purpose is to get the most feautures and quality and speed possible for
>many personal uses, at this time, and would like to see how long I can look
>after it without upgrading again (unless a specific reason makes it necesary for
>some special business purpose).
>  I'm particularly interested in chess playing use, which is not enough that it
>beats me easily, but that it provides me with the greatest analysis in a short
>amount of time for games and positions which I'm trying to analyze.
> Also, multi-media qualities should be as good as exists today.
>There should not be a quality in an Intel or anything of 1 Ghz. which isn't
>atleast as good in the amd 1400 even its weakest point.(for singal CPU, personal
>uses).
>  But if the only difference in the world between AMD 1400 and 800mhz. is speed
>alone, and the difference in price is very high, then I'd prefer the 800.
>
>If you or anyone can answer me all this, then I would consider that quite a
>great help. and a mystery buster.
>
>Thanks
>
>S.Taylor

The benchmarks I read indicate that for multimedia purposes (particularly
MP3/Windows Media/MPEG etc encoding/deconding) the P4 is way ahead.
Unfortunately, it is well behind the AMD processors in almost all other areas on
a MHz for MHz basis, including chess performance.

- Adam



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.