Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Analysis Questions--French Defense, Advance Variation novelty line

Author: Ferdinand S. Mosca

Date: 07:06:25 08/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 06, 2001 at 13:05:36, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:

>On August 06, 2001 at 04:40:09, Ferdinand S. Mosca wrote:
>
>>On August 05, 2001 at 20:45:07, Stephen A. Boak wrote:
>>
>>>[D]r3kb1r/pp1bnppp/1qn1p3/3pP3/3p2Q1/3B1N2/PPP2PPP/RNB1R1K1 w kq - 0 1
>>>
>>>In an OTB game yesterday, in a very interesting non-book position (see FEN
>>>diagram) arising a couple moves after the novelty 6...Qb6!? (the known Qc7 is
>>>likely better) in the French Advance Var, Black played 8...Bd7 and missed an
>>>opportunity for Nb4!, winning the Bishop pair and removing the important
>>>kingside attacker that covers h7-g6-f4.
>>>
>>>I had thought of the Nb4 idea, but discarded it in favor of Bd7, wanting to
>>>continue with development (Rc8 when possible, etc).  White replied 9. a3,
>>>permanently preventing Nb4.
>>>
>>>Here's the early game score including the diagrammed position and a few
>>>following moves:
>>>
>>>1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.Qg4 cxd4 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Bd3 Qb6 7.0–0 Nge7 8.Re1 Bd7 9.a3
>>>a5 10.Nbd2 Ng6 11.h4 Qc7 12.Qg3 Line
>>>
>>>This was my inaugural French Defense (I like to change my openings every now and
>>>then, for variety and to learn something new), so I don't have much experience
>>>or understanding of normal French lines.  I'm getting that now, heh heh, from
>>>the game lesson and post mortem analysis.
>>
>>Hello Stephen,
>>
>>I prefer Nb4 simply because the light Bishop of white has always been a factor
>>on white's kingside attack, more when black castles there.
>>
>>The terrain will tell that black has difficulties developing his kingside pieces
>>because of that strong e5-pawn. By the time you enter the middle game black will
>>try to eliminate that thorny e5-pawn by the move f6 from black.
>>Generally one should castle first before moving f6. But after the move f6, the
>>Bishop at d3 will become too powerful, so the best plan is to eliminate the
>>Bishop at d3 at all cost, go for it if you have the opportunity. If there is a3
>>by white as in the game then try to reconsider transfering your Bishop at d7 to
>>a6-square.
>>
>>Nine years in French Defense,
>>Dinan
>
>This is all true but I want to add something. There is another point here. The
>knight in c6 is also a good piece because attacks the key of the position, which
>is e5.

Black is cramped it has to free some space, look at the knights crossing its
other's squares. Attacking the e5-pawn by pieces is not enough here. A knight on
g6 will not stay long it will be driven away by h4-h5, h6 or h5 by black is a
disaster its squares around the kingside will become weak.

>Getting rid of Bd3 is _GOOD_ but it has to be balanced with the fact the
>you lose an attacker of e5. The point is that I do not like Qb6 at all because
>it defend a pawn (d4) that you really wish that white takes it, and Qb6 does not
>attack e5. Qc7 is much better in this respect.

What I usually see here is, Qc7 allows white to play Bf4, actually the main idea
of white's play here is to overprotect the e5-pawn, white is not even concern on
regaining the pawn at d4. At least by Qb6 white has to protect temporarily the
b2-pawn. There are typical variations I have encountered where white sacrifices
readily the b2 pawn in exchange for rapid development.

>In the Qc7 context maybe you do
>not want to play Nb4 and you want to accelerate f6 as much as you can.

I agree.

Regards,
Dinan

>But,
>after you played Qb6 maybe Nb4 is better since you already have other
>intentions.
>French is very tricky and very unbalanced...
>Never trust what a computer tells you in this kind of position, they often are
>clueless because there are a lot of long term plans here. They might give you a
>good move, but many times not the best move. Compare similar positions played by
>GMs, try the computers following the lines of those GMs to see if they
>change their mind, gather all information and make your own conclusion.
>You will be a stronger player next game!
>
>Regards,
>Miguel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.