Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What are you talking about?

Author: Jay Rinde

Date: 19:14:46 08/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 07, 2001 at 19:01:55, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On August 07, 2001 at 17:56:37, Jay Rinde wrote:
>
>>Alberto might be wrong, but your reasoning would drive an insane man more
>>insane.  What Alberto says does make sense.  It just isn't the way the world
>>works and whatever the software company says must be law because they have very
>>expensive lawyers working for them.  Who was it that said 2 plus 2 equals 5?
>>Jay
>
>I view it as someone saying:  2+2=5, and this must be true since nobody is
>paying enough attention to contradict me (including myself).
>
>If the license says you can only have it on one computer, it means that you can
>only have it on one computer.  It doesn't mean that you can have it on more than
>one computer if the others are off.  You might as well try to say that it means
>that you can have it on more than one computer as long as you aren't using more
>than one at once.  If they'd have meant the license to say that, it would have.
>
>The terms are what the license says, and the fact that lawyers are involved
>doesn't excuse breaking them.  The buyer could have taken the softwre back if he
>doesn't agree.
>
>If someone wants to say, "I see the terms and choose to break them, because it
>is of benefit to me," that's one thing.  At least the person doing it is taking
>responsibility.
>
>What bothers me when people say, "I saw these terms, but I choose to break them,
>and this is alright because <fill in the blank>."  That's a transparent attempt
>to *avoid* responsibility.
>
>If people think it's wrong to do something, they shouldn't do it, or at least
>they should admit (to themselves at least) that they are doing something wrong
>(and live with their conscience).  I think it's terrible when people do things
>they know are wrong, and yet which directly benefit them, and try to escape
>responsibility for it by saying they have some good reason for doing it.  I
>think that's a bad attitude.
>
>bruce

Much better than your original post.  No argument here! Jay



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.