Author: Ren Wu
Date: 21:30:11 08/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2001 at 16:03:34, Bruce Moreland wrote: >I've often heard people state that null move with R=3 is better than with R=2, >but I have never ever ever gotten a test result that indicates this. > My results were same as you. R=2 is alway better for me, both for test suites and for real games. I only have a relativly simple evaluation, and it doesn't recognize those typical tactics that nullmove will miss. I was wondering maybe this is the reason in my case that R=2 works better. But i don't have any hard evidence. Good luck for your program at Olympiad. Best Regards, Ren.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.