Author: Slater Wold
Date: 17:34:03 08/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 2001 at 16:19:13, Charles Young wrote: > >The match is not statistically significant I think "statistically significant" is only a computer vs computer significance. When Kaspy beat DB it was significant, and when he lost, that was significant too. Getting a GM to play a computer, like computers play computers, will _NEVER_ happen. It'll be intertesting. Lots of people will watch. And whoever wins (Kramnik more than likely) most of the world will hold it with more signifigance than 1,000 c vs c games. Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.