Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:37:21 08/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2001 at 15:23:15, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >Hi, > >at the moment is round 9/9 from AP-16 still running. >The results so far: > >01. SOS 03/00 6.5/8 >02. Gandalf 4.32g 6.0/8 >03. Deep Fritz T29c 5.5/8 >04. Hiarcs 7.32 5.0/8 >05. Nimzo 8 4.5/8 >06. Goliath Light 1.2 4.0/8 14.75 >07. Yace 0.99.50 4.0/8 13.25 >08. Gromit 3.8.2 4.0/8 12.25 >09. Junior 7 4.0/8 12.00 >10. Ikarus 0.18 3.5/8 >11. Deep Patzer 3.61 3.0/8 11.00 >12. Crafty 18.10 3.0/8 10.00 >13. Comet B.35 3.0/8 9.50 >14. Shredder 5.32 3.0/8 8.75 >15. AnMon 5.10 2.5/8 9.75 >16. Chess Tiger 14.0 2.5/8 8.50 > >On place 1 an amateur program, on the last place Chess Tiger 14.0. >Chess Tiger is with over 2.700 ELO in the AP rating list after 15 tourneys >on place 2 !! No sansation. Sos is not a weak program and there are weaker programs in your tournament like Comet or patzer. > >Every program can win the WM, but the best programs have more possibilities. > >Chess Tiger 14.0 won 4 AP tourneys, Deep Fritz T29c won 4 tounreys. >The chance that Chess Tiger 14.0 or Deep Fritz T29c won the WM is maybe 50% !! > >But it is clear that Gandalf and Shredder have better chances with longer time >controls. It is not clear. I need to see result of similiar tournaments vetween the same progrms at longer time control to be convinced that there is a significant statistical differece. > >We will see ... >Hope that an Amateur program win the World Championchip. Why? I see no reason to hope that an amatuer is going to win. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.