Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 12:46:12 08/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2001 at 15:37:21, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 10, 2001 at 15:23:15, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>at the moment is round 9/9 from AP-16 still running. >>The results so far: >> >>01. SOS 03/00 6.5/8 >>02. Gandalf 4.32g 6.0/8 >>03. Deep Fritz T29c 5.5/8 >>04. Hiarcs 7.32 5.0/8 >>05. Nimzo 8 4.5/8 >>06. Goliath Light 1.2 4.0/8 14.75 >>07. Yace 0.99.50 4.0/8 13.25 >>08. Gromit 3.8.2 4.0/8 12.25 >>09. Junior 7 4.0/8 12.00 >>10. Ikarus 0.18 3.5/8 >>11. Deep Patzer 3.61 3.0/8 11.00 >>12. Crafty 18.10 3.0/8 10.00 >>13. Comet B.35 3.0/8 9.50 >>14. Shredder 5.32 3.0/8 8.75 >>15. AnMon 5.10 2.5/8 9.75 >>16. Chess Tiger 14.0 2.5/8 8.50 >> >>On place 1 an amateur program, on the last place Chess Tiger 14.0. >>Chess Tiger is with over 2.700 ELO in the AP rating list after 15 tourneys >>on place 2 !! > >No sansation. >Sos is not a weak program and there are weaker programs in your tournament like >Comet or patzer. Yes, SOS is very strong, this is clear ! The sensation is that in the same tourney an amateur program is on 1 and a professional program on 16. I think the chance to get this constellation is maybe 1% !! But all is possible. >>Every program can win the WM, but the best programs have more possibilities. >> >>Chess Tiger 14.0 won 4 AP tourneys, Deep Fritz T29c won 4 tounreys. >>The chance that Chess Tiger 14.0 or Deep Fritz T29c won the WM is maybe 50% !! >> >>But it is clear that Gandalf and Shredder have better chances with longer time >>controls. > >It is not clear. >I need to see result of similiar tournaments vetween the same progrms at longer >time control to be convinced that there is a significant statistical differece. The same tourneys (20 AP tourneys) with 40 in 120 moves = 3 years on one machine. My CCE tourney is work enough and running now 14 months. I need 8 machines to play a good tourney with a lot of programs with longer time controls. >> >>We will see ... >>Hope that an Amateur program win the World Championchip. > >Why? >I see no reason to hope that an amatuer is going to win. Please thinking ... we have a nice marketing situation if an amateur program win the WM :-))) Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.