Author: Slater Wold
Date: 14:15:29 08/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2001 at 15:46:02, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >On August 10, 2001 at 15:44:40, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: > >> >>>I know you'd rather play 5.32, but for all competitive reasons, 5.0 would be the >>>better match. It has a FAR better book, >> >>or better: the Shredder 5.32 book is a cheapo project. Very disappointing. Too >>bad I can't use that > >....original Shredder 5 .... > >>book under another interface. > > >.... instead of that CB book. > >Sorry :) I got'cha. :) Rebel books are the only ones worth a damn. I don't care who CB swears they have making these books. (Or at least pruning them.) And yes, had S5.32 come with an at least halfway decent book, I might have used to instead of 5.0. I still feel strongly that 5.32 has a weaker middlegame. Some people say 5.32 is simply 5.0 in Chessbase form. But I've seen the versions disagree on moves, on the same hardware. So I know there's at least a little difference. Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.