Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Sensation in AP-16 ... Tiger on the last place, SOS on 1 ...

Author: Frank Quisinsky

Date: 13:52:31 08/11/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 11, 2001 at 15:08:20, William Wentworth wrote:

>On August 10, 2001 at 15:23:15, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>at the moment is round 9/9 from AP-16 still running.
>>The results so far:
>>
>>01. SOS 03/00                6.5/8
>>02. Gandalf 4.32g            6.0/8
>>03. Deep Fritz T29c          5.5/8
>>04. Hiarcs 7.32              5.0/8
>>05. Nimzo 8                  4.5/8
>>06. Goliath Light 1.2        4.0/8  14.75
>>07. Yace 0.99.50             4.0/8  13.25
>>08. Gromit 3.8.2             4.0/8  12.25
>>09. Junior 7                 4.0/8  12.00
>>10. Ikarus 0.18              3.5/8
>>11. Deep Patzer 3.61         3.0/8  11.00
>>12. Crafty 18.10             3.0/8  10.00
>>13. Comet B.35               3.0/8   9.50
>>14. Shredder 5.32            3.0/8   8.75
>>15. AnMon 5.10               2.5/8   9.75
>>16. Chess Tiger 14.0         2.5/8   8.50
>>
>>On place 1 an amateur program, on the last place Chess Tiger 14.0.
>>Chess Tiger is with over 2.700 ELO in the AP rating list after 15 tourneys
>>on place 2 !!
>>
>>Every program can win the WM, but the best programs have more possibilities.
>>
>>Chess Tiger 14.0 won 4 AP tourneys, Deep Fritz T29c won 4 tounreys.
>>The chance that Chess Tiger 14.0 or Deep Fritz T29c won the WM is maybe 50% !!
>>
>>But it is clear that Gandalf and Shredder have better chances with longer time
>>controls.
>>
>>We will see ...
>>Hope that an Amateur program win the World Championchip.
>>
>>At the moment is Gromit 3.82 - SOS 03/00 running
>>Gromit = -3.41
>>SOS    = +3.07
>>
>>Nice, SOS win the first AP tourney!!
>>I add in the evening the results on the page, available under:
>>http://amateurschach.in-trier.de/schach/cbase/experiment.htm
>>
>>Best
>>Frank
>
>There may be a mistake in your configuration of Tiger.
>From what time Shredder has better chances than Tiger
>> 5 min / game ?
>>10 min / game ?
>>15 min / game ?
>>20 min / game ?
>Is the same true for both engines on any machine (also on <500 Mhz 32Mb) ?
>
>Wacky Willow

Hi,

I don't understand your question completly.

I think it is not possible to say from which time is engine "a" better as engine
"b" !

Example:
Tiger win against Shredder 10:5
Tiger lose against Gandalf 5:10
Gandalf lose against Shredder 5:10

All this is not very interesting
I mean is engine a or b better in only "one" engine match.

More interesting are a lot of engines and more results.

You can download the log files from the Deep Shredder vs. The World match. The
log files are very interesting. I think you can very fast see that Shredder need
a little bit time and you can then yourself answere of your question.

Best
Frank



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.