Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 12:40:34 08/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 2001 at 03:40:20, Tony Werten wrote: >On August 09, 2001 at 17:20:26, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: ... >>I am doing something different that ends up to be similar in concept. >>I do a regular nullmove, but if it fails high, I do not return beta, I just >>reduce the depth = depth-(R+1) and do a normal search. > >Then why do a nullmove first ? You're doing double work now. This reduced depth >razoring is an alternative to nullmove. ?? a very bad alternative then. Doing a null-move is obviusly giving an advantadge to the oponent that's why it is used. I don't use razoring but I think who uses it does it at the last plies and using info of the hash at least. >cheers, > >Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.