Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:43:58 05/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 1998 at 03:25:03, blass uri wrote: > >On May 10, 1998 at 18:51:35, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > > >>Game II: > >>36. axb5! >> >>This is a brilliant move, which i can easily explain >>with DB kingsafety. There are several tens of pawns needed to make >>a program play axb5! instead of Qb6. If your kingsafety however gives >>white a huge penalty after the line given by GM Lubosh Kavalek >>(Qb6 Rd8 axb5 Rab8 Qxa6 e4 and the black queen gets into the white >>position driving white king to centre with queens on the board), then >>this move is easily explainable, supposing that DB has singular >>extensions >>and can see here line of about 15 half moves among which a lot of checks >>and forced moves. >I do not understand why did deepblue reject 36.Qb6 and if Rd8 >37.Be4 > > Uri If i look to the score of Qb6 in my program and then to the score of axb5 in Diep, then the difference is few tens of a pawn. So few king safety terms and freepawn code which says that covered freepawns are not that well compared to a far freepawn and there you are.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.