Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: More Microsoft annoyances ...part 2

Author: Adam Oellermann

Date: 04:26:22 08/14/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 14, 2001 at 04:11:58, Jeremiah Penery wrote:

>On August 14, 2001 at 00:44:43, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>>Oh, and like the MS clip said, there are programs that when run under Windows 98
>>or ME will USE a 2nd CPU.  But they are not going through the OS.  CAD and even
>>the deep programs will use a 2nd CPU under Windows 98 and ME.
>
>This is wrong.  Win9x/Me do not even acknowledge that a second processor exists.
> Since in this case the program can't know more than the OS, it is impossible
>that a program can use both CPUs under such an operating system.  Really, it
>just does not work.

Before I start, I don't know either way, having never tried an SMP box on a
silly operating system. However, the notion that software is limited to what is
exposed by the OS is surely incorrect. It seems to me that low-level software
can choose to use OS services or bypass them. Slater may be talking about
software simply bypassing OS services in this instance. It may not be easy, but
it should surely be *possible*.

- Adam



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.