Author: leonid
Date: 16:29:42 08/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 16, 2001 at 19:00:56, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 16, 2001 at 18:58:17, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 16, 2001 at 16:47:03, Heiner Marxen wrote: >> >>>On August 16, 2001 at 12:03:51, leonid wrote: >>> >>>>Hi! >>>> >>>>This position is intended to be solvable by every program, after only minor >>>>resistance. >>>> >>>>[D]1rrbbq2/3k4/1qqpnq2/3B4/2NPR3/1QB1KQ2/QN3PQQ/Q5QR w - - >>>> >>>>Please indicate your result. >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Leonid. >>> >>>Hello Leonid! >>> >>>You should try to find titles for your beautiful creations! >>>For this one I suggest "The King", for obvious reasons :-) >>> >>>I've not yet worked on this new creation of yours, since my K7/600 after >>>60 hours is still busy crunching on your corrected "US". >>>http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?183489 >>>I know, you warned us :-) but I thought that would not apply to Chest. >>>That there is no mate in 8 needed only 40 minutes with an apparent EBF >>>below 10, so I expected less than 10 hours. But this one is a hard nut >>>for Chest. >> >>I understand that chest is working on finding if there is a mate in 9 >>Chessmaster6000(ss=10) can see mate in 12 in 7:20 at depth 1/6(PIII850) >> >>Uri > >It can see even mate in 11 in 16:58 at depth 1/7 >The move is d2-e2 This is good news! Mine was able to find by selective only mate in 12. It is true also that I not used all parameters for lower search but only the most promissing one. In 12 moves mate was not very quick. It was found in 46 seconds. Leonid. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.