Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 07:58:03 08/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 16, 2001 at 12:48:52, Roy Eassa wrote: >On August 15, 2001 at 23:27:22, K. Burcham wrote: > >> >> >>maybe this will help >> >> >>If you can see what follows the sacrifice of White's rook on move 14, below, >>(from Gambit Tiger 2), you are grandmaster strength and your wins against >>computers are not because you play anti-computer style! >> >>1. e4 Nf6 2. Nc3 e5 3. h4 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3 5. dxc3 d6 6. Bd3 O-O 7. Bg5 h6 8. Nh3 >>hxg5 9. hxg5 Bg4 10. f3 Bxh3 11. Rxh3 Nfd7 12. f4 g6 13. Qg4 Kg7 14. Rh7+ Kxh7 >>15. Qh4+ Kg8 16. O-O-O Re8 17. Qh6 Nf6 18. Rh1 Nh5 19. f5 Re6 20. fxe6 Qf8 21. >>exf7+ Kxf7 22. Rf1+ Nf4 23. Bc4+ Ke7 24. Qxf8+ Kxf8 25. g3 1-0 >> >> >> >> >> >>Wenn Sie sehen können, daß was dem Opfer des Turmes des Weiß auf >>Bewegung 14 unten folgt (vom Gambittiger 2), sind Sie >>grandmasterstärke und Ihre Gewinne gegen Computer sind, nicht weil >>Sie Anti-Computerart spielen! >> >>1. e4 Nf6 2. Nc3 e5 3. h4 Bb4 4. a3 Bxc3 5. dxc3 d6 6. Bd3 O-O 7. Bg5 h6 8. Nh3 >>hxg5 9. hxg5 Bg4 10. f3 Bxh3 11. Rxh3 Nfd7 12. f4 g6 13. Qg4 Kg7 14. Rh7+ Kxh7 >>15. Qh4+ Kg8 16. O-O-O Re8 17. Qh6 Nf6 18. Rh1 Nh5 19. f5 Re6 20. fxe6 Qf8 21. >>exf7+ Kxf7 22. Rf1+ Nf4 23. Bc4+ Ke7 24. Qxf8+ Kxf8 25. g3 1-0 >> >> >>kburcham > > >Thank you! Hello! I understend now. Thanks for this Translation and for this compliment! :) But this is fact: I'm no a Grandmaster and I have no a grandmaster strength. Kind Regards, Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.