Author: pavel
Date: 23:25:52 08/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 18, 2001 at 19:54:19, Dann Corbit wrote: >On August 18, 2001 at 03:40:01, Frank Phillips wrote: > >>On August 18, 2001 at 03:06:38, pavel wrote: >> >>>simple questions, >>> >>>whats the best Commercial C++ compilers out there? (in your opinion) >>>and how good is borland 5.02? >>> >>>tnx >>>pavs. >> >>My program (mostly C) is 25-30% faster with MS VC++ (for Windows) than gcc-2.96 >>under Linux. If I recall correctly Borland under Windows was similar to gcc. >> >>MS is best (for speed) but you need to be prepared to spend a lot of money to >>buy the non-learning version if you want fast executables. > >Though results vary from system to system, you might also try the Intel >compiler. Note that it requires MS VC++ 6.0 or higher, and has no IDE by itself >(it uses the MS VC++ IDE). > >You can do a trial for free. Sometimes there is a good speedup, sometimes not. so there is nothing special about the borland C++ 5.02? coz I just got it as a present. pavs..
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.