Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:03:23 08/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2001 at 01:36:56, Chessfun wrote: >On August 18, 2001 at 19:31:45, James T. Walker wrote: > >>I just checked my database of games played on auto232 for draw percentage of >>some programs. The reason I did this is because I noticed that Junior 7 seemed >>to draw less than normal. Here is what I found: >> >>Program Drawing % >>Junior 7 20.6% >>Gambit Tiger 2.0 40.36% >>Chess Tiger 14.0 37.16% >>Hiarcs 7.32 34.18% >>Junior 6.0 32.93% >>Fritz 6e 34.46% >> >>Quite a contrast between Junior 7 & Gambit Tiger 2.0. All games were played on >>Athlon 900 TB's using auto232 and include Blitz/Active/Standard time controls. >>Has anyone else noticed this about Junior 7 ? I would be interested in >>theories. >>Jim > > >From my current list; > >Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > 1 theking (CMFun) : 2641 75 55 76 55.9 % 2599 40.8 % > 2 Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 2639 25 22 559 60.4 % 2566 40.3 % > 3 Deep Fritz : 2632 30 26 420 58.0 % 2576 34.0 % > 4 Chess Tiger 14.0 : 2628 28 23 457 58.1 % 2571 42.2 % > 5 Junior 7 : 2609 46 37 216 51.9 % 2596 26.9 % > >Although 6% higher than yours clearly it's a lot lower than most >other top programs. Junior 7 plays very active, aggressive chess. > >Sarah. Junior7 is also leading in avoiding draws in the ametuers against professionals tournament see http://www.amateurschach.de/schach/cbase/statistiken.htm The results suggest that the good professionals can be sure of winning a tournament against the amaturs and the weak professionals (professionals that are sold only as part of the young talents) if the tournament contains hundreds of games. The first 7 place are catched by the good professional. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.