Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Question: WAC.001 and null move

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 02:22:36 08/20/01

Go up one level in this thread

On August 20, 2001 at 04:41:41, José Carlos wrote:

>  Then I tried not doing it in the PV, and the strange things went out. The tree
>got smaller and the search deeper.
>  I don't know if this is the correct way of doing it (never do a null-move in
>the PV), cause I like to try myself before looking other's sources to see how
>they do it. But looks reasonable. In the PV, we don't expect to fail high, so
>why trying a null move?

I don't do this, and crafty doesn't seem to be doing this either.

However, your explanation makes perfect sense and I will try it.

--
GCP

• Re: Question: WAC.001 and null move Robert Hyatt 06:43:22 08/20/01
  • Re: Question: WAC.001 and null move José Carlos 08:56:35 08/20/01
    • Re: Question: WAC.001 and null move Robert Hyatt 11:30:15 08/20/01
      • Re: Question: WAC.001 and null move José Carlos 13:55:57 08/20/01
        • Re: Question: WAC.001 and null move Robert Hyatt 18:13:18 08/21/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.