Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GW-Basic = GatesWilliam-Basic

Author: Christopher R. Dorr

Date: 06:10:01 08/21/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 20, 2001 at 13:41:50, William H Rogers wrote:

>On August 19, 2001 at 20:42:19, Pete Galati wrote:
>
>>On August 19, 2001 at 14:08:32, Roy Eassa wrote:
>>
>>>On August 18, 2001 at 10:20:09, James Swafford wrote:
>>>
>>>>On August 18, 2001 at 08:50:22, Pete Galati wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On August 18, 2001 at 06:59:09, Grzegorz Sidorowicz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Can you translate it to C?
>>>>>>Is any translator (Basic to C) ?
>>>>>
>>>>>Are you sure it's Basic?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Oh yeah.. reminds me of good ole' GW-BASIC.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Where GW was Bill (William) Gates' initials in reverse! :-)
>>
>>Actually, I heard that it stood for Gee Wiz Basic believe it or not.
>>
>>I did manage to dig up a copy of GW-Basic, and the only time I've ever used it
>>was to run a GW-Basic Chess program.
>>
>>Pete
>
>Sorry fellows, but you are both wrong. GW stood for Graphics/Windows Basic as
>both could be implemented in that limited version of basic.
>Bill

Really? That's very surprising. I didn't know that too many people outside of
PARC had much of an idea about the concept of 'windows' in 1981, when GW-BASIC
came out. I don't recall being able to do windows in GW-Basic, other than some
real rough kludging writing and rewriting screen areas. COuld be tho...haven't
seen it in over a decade  :) Did write my first (and only) chess program in it's
decendent, Q-basic  :)

Chris




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.