Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A matter of chess understanding!

Author: Simon Finn

Date: 03:15:29 08/22/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 21, 2001 at 14:24:06, Torstein Hall wrote:

>I resently saw a game in a local newspaper where one of the players "improved"
>on the opening theory in the following position.
>
>NN - NN
>Bergen Open 2001
>
>1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Bd3 dxc4 7.Bxc4 b5 8.Be2 a6 9.e4
>b4 10.e5 bxc3 11.exf6 Bb4 TN This move was presented as an improvment over
>normal theory! The reason behind the move was as follows. If 12.fxg7+ then c2+!!
>and black is winning easily.
>
>[D]r1bqk2r/3n1ppp/p1p1pP2/8/1b1P4/2p2N2/PP2BPPP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - 0
>
>Of course white can not be that naive, but plays 12.0-0 Nxf6 and we reach the
>critical position 1.
>
>[D]r1bqk2r/5ppp/p1p1pn2/8/1b1P4/2p2N2/PP2BPPP/R1BQ1RK1 w kq - 0 13
>
>Can your program find the best move here?
>Some computer attempts:
>
>Crafty at ply 12 gives: 13.Qa4?! with a score of - 0.17 (Black is better)
>
>Hiarcs 7.32:Likes 13.Ne5?! with -0.5 score
>
>Fritz comes up with the correct move at ply 12 but can not see that white has a
>large advantage!: 13.bxc3!
>
>OK lets continue:
>
>13.bxc3 Bxc3 If 13...Be7 black play the normal variation with a tempo missing.
>
>(The real)Critical position 2:
>[D]r1bqk2r/5ppp/p1p1pn2/8/3P4/2b2N2/P3BPPP/R1BQ1RK1 w kq - 0 14
>
>What to play with white?
>
>Fritz want to play: Rb1?! at ply 13
>Hiarcs also likes Rb1
>Crafty goes for the same shit.....
>
>Can any program within normal tournament time limits find the right move?
>And the right answer is: 14.Ba3!
>
>Here is a typical continuation. 14...Bxa1 15.Qxa1 Bb7 16.Ne5 Qc7 17.Nc4 and now
>some computers start to realise that white has the advantage.

15... Bb7? is a horrible move.

15... Nd5 is much better, intending Ne7 and O-O or f6 and Kf7.

For example, after 15 ... Nd5 16. Ne5 Ne7 17. Bf3 O-O,
White can regain all the lost material may have problems
with his d-pawn. No better than equality for White, I think.

Perhaps White should try 15. Qc2!? instead?

Simon


> Let the game
>continue: 17...Nd5 18.Nd6+ Kd8 19.Qb2 Bc8 20.Rb1 a5 21.Bc5 a4 22.Bc4
>
>[D]r1bk3r/2q2ppp/2pNp3/2Bn4/p1BP4/8/PQ3PPP/1R4K1 b - - 0 22
>
>..and now even the dullest computer start to see the truth. White has a big
>advantage!
>
>It looks like computer chess has a long way to go before it understand the
>consept of a real positional sacrifise.
>
>Torstein
>
>PS I guess this is Childrens knowledge for Kramnik. Maybee I should mail him the
>game. :-)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.